检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:毛全宗[1] 杨瑜[1] 李汉忠[1] 纪志刚[1] 刘广华[1] 肖河[1] 黄钟明[1] 荣石[1]
机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院北京协和医学院北京协和医院泌尿外科,100730
出 处:《北京医学》2014年第2期106-110,共5页Beijing Medical Journal
摘 要:目的系统评价A型肉毒素(BT-A)膀胱逼尿肌多点注射治疗膀胱过度活动症(OAB)的疗效及安全性。方法检索PubMed、Science Direct及中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)关于BT-A膀胱逼尿肌多点注射治疗OAB的随机对照试验。对符合条件的研究结果应用RevMan 4.2统计软件进行数据分析。以BT-A组相对于安慰剂组在排尿症状、尿动力检查及生活质量评分等方面的加权均数差(WMD)为指标进行疗效评价,以两组在不良事件的相对危险度(RR)为指标进行安全性评价。结果共纳入9项研究,Meta分析结果显示,BT-A组相对于安慰剂组在改善症状(急迫性尿失禁,尿急、尿频,尿痛)方面WMD分别为-0.31(P<0.00001)、-7.92(P<0.00001)、-3.87(P=0.14);尿动力学检查方面[最大膀胱容量(MCC)、最大逼尿肌压力(MDP)]WMD分别为205.99(P<0.00001)、-42.82(P<0.00001);生活质量评分方面(IIQ-7、UDI-6评分)WMD分别为-22.06(P=0.16)、-12.48(P=0.14)。BT-A组相对于安慰剂组在泌尿系感染和尿潴留的RR值分别为1.25(P=0.008)和5.96(P<0.00001)。结论 BT-A对缓解尿急、尿频、尿痛及急迫性尿失禁等症状有明确作用;BT-A可以提高膀胱容量、降低逼尿肌压力;但是,BT-A有发生泌尿系感染及尿潴留的危险。Objective To analyze the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin A (BT-A) injection in treating overactive bladder (OAB) based on the published randomized clinical trials. Methods Randomized clinical trials of BT-A in treating OAB were searched from PubMed, Science Direct and CBM. A recta-analysis of the included clinical trials was statistically aualyzed with RevMan 4.2 software. Efficacy was assessed with the weighted mean differeo.ee (WMD) (~f voiding symptoms, urodynamic study and quality of life scores.Safety and tolerability were assessed with the relative risk (RR) of the adverse events (AE). Results A total of 9 clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis. Overall WMD were -0.31 (P 〈 0.00001) for urgent incontinence; -7.92 (P 〈 0.00001) for urgency and -3.87 (P = 0.14) for frequency in voiding symptoms; 205.99(P 〈 0.00001) for MCC and -42.82 (P 〈 0.00001) for MDP in urodynamic study; -22.06(P = 0.16) for I- 1Q-7 scores and -12.48 (P = 0.14) for UDI-6 scores in quality of life evaluation. The overall relative risk of BT-A versus placebo was 1.25 (P = 0.008) for urinary tract infection and 5.96 (P 〈 0.00001) for urinary retention. Conclusion BT-A injection is effective in relieving OAB symptoms, such as urgent incontinence and urgency. BT-A can improve MCC and decrease MDP; while BT-A can cause adverse events such as urinary tract infection and urinary retention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44