检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国海洋大学医药学院,海洋药物教育部重点实验室,山东省糖科学与糖工程重点实验室,山东青岛266003
出 处:《中国药学杂志》2014年第4期271-274,共4页Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal
基 金:山东省科技发展计划(2011GSF11815);青岛市公共领域科技支撑计划项目(11-2-3-73-jh)
摘 要:目的综述硫酸多糖类药物含量测定方法研究进展。方法查阅近年来国内外研究文献,对硫酸多糖类药物的含量测定方法如直接染色法、酸降解-显色法、光度滴定法、液相色谱法和生物效价法进行介绍,比较各方法的特点。结果与结论每种方法的专属性、精密度和准确性、实际操作可行性以及仪器花费各有差别,但高效液相色谱法以其专属性好、灵敏度和准确度高等优势能够更真实地反映药物含量,因此在药物含量测定中应用更为广泛,是未来含量测定的主要方法。OBJECTIVE To review the progress in the content assay methods of sulfate polysaccharide drugs. METHODS By consulting the literature at home and abroad in recent years, the content assay methods of sulfate polysaccharide drugs, including direct staining method, acid-degradation color-development method, photometric titration, liquid chromatography and biopotency, are intro- duced and compared. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION The specificity, precision and accuracy, feasibility of practical operation and the instrument cost of the five methods are different. But high performance liquid chromatography method with good specificity, high sensitivity, and accuracy can give more accurate result of the drug content. It is more widely applied in the determination of drug content, so it will be the main method of content assay in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7