检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鲍慧芬[1] 孟武[1] 朱君君[1] 张正红[1]
机构地区:[1]芜湖市疾病预防控制中心慢病科,安徽芜湖241000
出 处:《现代预防医学》2014年第5期849-851,共3页Modern Preventive Medicine
摘 要:目的对芜湖市县及以上医疗机构死亡病例网络报告系统报告质量进行评估。方法使用单位报告率、报告及时率、审核及时率、常见编码错误分布等指标对芜湖市2012年县及以上医疗机构死亡病例报告情况进行评价。结果全市单位报告率100.00%;报告及时率为93.59%;审核及时率为100.00%;有明显编码错误的比例为11.06%,其中症状或体征类型报卡比例为5.75%,心血管病缺乏诊断意义报卡比例为3.69%。结论医疗机构死亡病例网络报告目前存在比较普遍的问题是死因报告和编码质量有待提高,根本死因确定和编码培训工作待加强。Objective To study the quality of reporting network system on death cases among county and above levels' medical institutions in Wuhu City. Methods Data on variables related to unit reporting rate, timely rate of reporting, timely rate of auditing and distribution of common coding errors were applied to the assessment of reporting deaths in 2012. Results The unit reporting rate was 100.00%.The timely rate of reporting was 93.59%.The timely rate of auditing was 100.00%. The percentage of obvious coding errors among deaths reported was 11.06%; the proportion of symptoms or signs of death report card was 5.75%; the proportion of lacked significance reported cards in the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases was 3.69%. Conclusion Currently, there is a widespread problem that the quality of death-case-reporting and the quality of coding on death causes should be further improved, which indi- cates that the training on ascertainment and coding of underlying death causes is quite essential.
分 类 号:R195[医药卫生—卫生统计学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.166.43