检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何平[1,2] 鹿翠香[1,2] 王巍[1,2] 王春波[1,2] 李玉华[1,2] 尚晓霞[1,2]
机构地区:[1]齐齐哈尔医学院第五附属医院 [2]大庆龙南医院呼吸内科,黑龙江大庆163000
出 处:《中国伤残医学》2014年第5期9-11,共3页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨2种不同麻醉方法在支气管镜检查中的效果。方法:对我院2012年7月~2013年7月接受支气管镜检查的155例患者随机分为2组,个体化麻醉组( A组)80例,常规喷壶麻醉组( B组)75例,观察对比2组麻醉的效果。结果:A组麻醉成功率98.70%,B组麻醉成功率94.67%,A组成功率优于B组。结论:个体化麻醉的效果明显优于常规喷壶麻醉的效果,有推广应用价值。Objective:To compare the efficiency of two techniques used in anaesthesia for bronchoscopy .Methods:155 patients who received bronchoscopy from July 2012 to July 2013 in our hospital were randomly enrolled into two groups:group A ( n =80 ) , anaesthe-sia in dividual;and group B ( n =75) in which the anaesthetic was sprayed on laryngeal region .The efficiencies of the two techniques were compared.Results:There were significant more patients who experience successful anesthesia in group A (98.7% ) than those in Group B (94.67%).Conclusions:The anaesthesia in dividual was more efficient than that by laryngeal spray .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222