检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学宣武医院急诊科,北京100053
出 处:《临床外科杂志》2014年第1期38-39,共2页Journal of Clinical Surgery
摘 要:目的 评价乳腺脓肿微创治疗的临床应用价值.方法 将86例乳腺脓肿患者分为穿刺引流组(29例)、小切口引流组(33例)和传统切开引流组(24例),观察各组治疗效果.结果 穿刺引流组在疼痛评分、愈合时间和换药次数方面优势明显,传统引流组有一定比例的并发症.脓肿直径大于5cm者微创治疗失败率明显增高(P〈0.01).结论 微创治疗在乳腺脓肿的治疗中具有极大意义,尤其适用于脓腔较小者,但传统切开引流法仍有意义.Objective To evaluate the clinical value of mini-invasive treatment of breast abscess. Methods A total of 86 patients with breast abscess were treated with puncture drainage( n =- 29), micro- incision drainage( n--33 )and traditional incision drainage (n =24 ). The treatment effects were compared among the three groups. Results The puncture drainage group had obvious advantages in pain score, heal- ing time and frequency of dressing changes. There were a few cases with complications in the group of tra- ditional incision drainage. The failure rate of those cases with abscess diameter great than 5cm was obviously higher( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion Mini-invasive treatment has great applicable value in the treatment of breast abscess, especially in cases with smaller abscess cavity. But the traditional incision drainage method still owns its significance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70