检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾成宽[1]
机构地区:[1]北京工业职业技术学院社会科学系,北京100042
出 处:《北京工业职业技术学院学报》2014年第1期116-120,共5页Journal of Beijing Polytechnic College
基 金:2013年北京工业职业技术学院科研课题(BGZYKY201325)
摘 要:纵观当今世界主要国家或地区刑法通常规定特别没收制度,只有少数国家或地区刑法规定了一般没收制度,我国就属后一类之列。究其本质,虽与一国法律文化传统相关,但刑法发展至今日,仍在刑法中保留一般没收财产刑,既与当代社会价值、刑罚理念、刑罚目的相悖,也存在着适用上难以克服之弊端。因而,应对我国的没收制度予以完善,从最终的发展方向看应予废除,并建立相关替代和补充制度,以与当今国际刑罚发展趋势相协同。Nowadays, the special confiscation system is widely applied in main countries and regions, only several countries and regions stipulate common confiscation system by criminal law, and China belong to the latter. In es- sence, it is related to tradition of legal culture, however, develop up to now, still reserve the forfeiture of common confiscation in criminal law, contrary to the contemporary social value, penalty concept and objective, and also dif- ficult to suitable for use. Consequently, the forfeiture of property in Chinese Criminal Law should be improved, and be abolished in the future, and furthermore, it should be established some relevant substitution and complement system, to adapted to the of development tendency of criminal law in the world.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.61.156