课程、专业设置与当代中国历史地理学科  

Contemporary Historical Geography and the Arrangement of Speciality and Curriculum in China's Mainland

作　　者：丁超[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学清史研究所,北京100872

出　　处：《齐鲁学刊》2014年第1期34-42,共9页Qilu Journal

基　　金：2013年北京市支持中央高校共建项目--青年英才计划"史地徘徊:历史地理学的学史梳理与理论探研"(YETP0175)

摘　　要：教育与学术之间存在着互动关联,基于建国以来高等教育体制中课程与专业设置的考察,可对中国历史地理学发展史有新的认识。建国初期,沿革地理被正名为历史地理之后,该学科在历史学和地理学两个"学术阵营"中分途发展。随着宏观教育政策和具体措施的调整,历史地理学在学术阵营中的地位经历了降格、升级与回潮,在共存局面被打破之后,激发出学论与官论之争。随后的学科专业自主设置,使得历史地理学处于"自说自话"的境况。而2010年以来学位目录和本科专业目录的调整,为历史地理学的发展带来不确定性的同时,又提供了潜在的发展契机。教育及学术行政管理部门在专业设置上应做到原则性和灵活性的协调统一,为学术界根据学科发展的实际需要提供自主权,从而为历史地理学的不同发展路径提供充分自由竞争、优胜劣汰的空间。There was a close reciprocal effect between education and academy. Based on the research on the arrangement of speciality and curriculum in China's Mainland from 1949, this paper found some new discoveries in the academic history of Chi-nese historical geography. After the formal foundation of historical geography, the discipline gained development space from the history and geography fields. With the adjustment of macro educational policies and micro measures, historical geography un-derwent some rising and falling courses. Scholars commonly regarded historical geography as the sub-field of geography, but this opinion didn＇t approved by the government authorities. Recently, the authorities transferred the decision-making power of speciality arrangement to lower levels, so, the historical geography discipline was faced with both uncertainty and potential turning point.

关 键 词：课程 专业设置 历史地理学 学术史 

分 类 号：K09[历史地理—历史学]