社会必要劳动时间质的规定性和量的表现是两个不同范畴——基于社会必要劳动时间“另一种意义”的逻辑判断  

Two Different Categories:Quality Description and Quantity Manifestation——The Logical Judgment of “Another Meaning”Based on Social Necessary Labor Time

作　　者：崔占峰[1] 王丞[2] 

机构地区：[1]烟台大学经济管理学院,山东烟台264005 [2]中国海洋大学管理学院,山东青岛266071

出　　处：《齐鲁学刊》2014年第1期76-81,共6页Qilu Journal

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"进城流动商贩问题的本质及其治理体系研究"(13CJY032);山东省社会科学规划项目"基于刘易斯转折区间假说的农村经济发展方式研究"(12DJJJ15)

摘　　要：社会必要劳动时间质的规定性内含在三个逻辑命题与一个隐含假定中。其"另一种意义",既不能理解为对其质的规定性的补充,更不能解释为对其质的规定性的否定,而应理解为社会必要劳动时间衡量商品价值的量的表现。如果将其质的规定性等同于量的表现,从而混淆两种规定性之间的内在差别,就容易造成马克思主义经济学基本范畴的混乱。发现和总结社会必要劳动时间决定价值的量的种种表现在现代市场经济中具有重要现实意义。The quality description of social necessary labor time is included in three basic logical proposition and one implicit prescription, but ＂another meaning＂ of social necessary labor, can not be understood as the supplement of its qualitative re-quirements, or it can not be interpreted as a negation of its qualitative stipulation. It should be understood as the manifestation that socially necessary labor measures the quantity of the value of commodities. If we see the specific dynamic manifestation of the quantity of socially necessary labor as its quantity manifestation, we＇ll get confused of the differences between the two pre- scriptions as quality and quantity, which will lead to a confusion of the basic concepts in Marxist economics. Discovering and concluding the dynamic rule of socially necessary labor determines the quantity of the magnitude of value further has important practical significance in modern market economy.

关 键 词：社会必要劳动时间 质的规定性 量的表现 另一种意义 

分 类 号：F01[经济管理—政治经济学]