检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王美芳[1] 袁翠翠[1] 杨峰[1] 张秀娟[1]
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2014年第1期24-27,47,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(31271104);山东省"十二五"高校特色重点学科(发展与教育心理学)资助
摘 要:目的:探讨个人相关性对个体内隐和外显公平推理的影响。方法:预实验选取38名大学生,采用探测词再认范式考察了个体的内隐公平推理情况。正式实验采用探测词再认范式和7点评定量表考察了个人相关性对74名大学生内隐和外显公平推理的影响。结果:①被试对实验句子的反应时显著长于对控制句子的反应时;②在高、低个人相关条件下,被试对实验句子的反应时都显著长于控制句子,但在高个人相关条件下实验句子与控制句子的反应时差异更为显著;③高、低个人相关条件下大学生外显公平判断的评分没有显著差异。结论:个人相关性对大学生的内隐公平推理有显著影响,高个人相关条件下的内隐公平推理比低个人相关条件下更为强烈;但是个人相关性对大学生的外显公平推理无显著影响。Objective: To explore the influence of personal relevance on implicit and explicit social justice inferences. Methods: Spontaneous or implicit justice inferences were measured using the probe recognition paradigm and explicit jus- tice inferences were measured using a 7-point rating scale in a sample of 74 college students. Results: (1)Participants re- sponded significantly slower on experimental trails than control trails. (2)Participants ' reaction time to experimental trails were significant longer than control trails both in high personal relevance and low personal relevance conditions, but the dif- ferences between experimental trails and control trails in high personal relevance condition were more significant than those in low personal relevance condition. (3)There was no significant difference between the college students' explicit justice judgments in high and low personal relevance condition. Conclusion: Personal relevance has a significant effect on implic- it justice inferences, with a highly personally relevant justice-relevant event leading to strong implicit justice inferences, but has no effect on explicit justice inferences.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.10.2