烤烟密集烤房不同装烟方式烘烤效果对比分析  

Comparative Analysis of Baked Effect of Flue-cured Tobacco Loaded by Different Patterns in Bulk Curing Barn

作　　者：张警予[1] 娄元菲[1] 王文超 李昂[1] 董艳辉[1] 杨彦明[1] 贺帆[1] 宫长荣[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南农业大学烟草学院,河南郑州450002 [2]红云红河集团曲靖卷烟厂,云南曲靖655001

出　　处：《江西农业学报》2014年第3期65-68,79,共5页Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi

摘　　要：挂竿、烟夹、散叶等3种装烟方式的烘烤对比试验表明:与传统挂竿烘烤相比,较散叶烘烤省工、节能,挂竿装烟和针式烟夹装烟环节用工效率基本一致,差异不明显,但编烟环节针式烟夹明显省工,总体节省了0.39个工/667 m2;散叶堆积较挂竿的各个环节均明显省工,散叶堆积较挂竿节省了1.60个工/667 m2,较针式烟夹节省用工1.21个工/667 m2。针式烟夹和散叶堆积较挂竿烘烤能耗成本略有降低,散叶堆积干烟较挂竿节省能耗成本0.22元/kg,针式烟夹干烟节省0.07元/kg。烟夹烤后烟叶的化学成分协调性最好;烟叶均价以及中上等烟比例针式烟夹和散叶堆积均较好,针式烟夹和散叶堆积干烟均价较挂竿分别高0.9和0.5元/kg。The comparative tests for the baked effect of flue -cured tobacco loaded by 3 different ways （ hanging rod , tobacco clamping, and dispersal leaf ） were carried out in bulk curing barn .The results indicated that： in comparison with the traditional hanging-rod baking , the dispersal-leaf baking could save labor and energy .The labor efficiency in tobacco -loading of hanging -rod way was basically the same as that of needle -type tobacco-clamping way , but the labor used in tobacco -weaving of the for-mer was 0.39 workers/667 m2 higher than that of the latter .The labor used in all links of dispersal -leaf way was 1.60 workers/667 m2 less than that of hanging -rod way, and 1.21 workers/667 m2 less than that of needle -type tobacco-clamping way.The energy-consumption cost in tobacco -baking of dispersal -leaf way and needle -type tobacco-clamping way was respectively 0.22 and 0.07 yuan/kg lower than that of hanging -rod way.The chemical compositions in the baked tobacco leaves loaded by tobacco -clamping way had the best harmony .The average price of baked dry tobacco leaves of needle -type tobacco-clamping way and dis-persal-leaf way was respectively 0.9 and 0.5 yuan/kg higher than that of hanging -rod way, and the medium-superior proportion of baked tobacco leaves of these two tobacco -loading ways was also higher than that of hanging -rod way .

关 键 词：烤烟 密集烘烤 装烟方式 效益 

分 类 号：S572[农业科学—烟草工业]