检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国电力工程顾问集团西南电力设计院,成都610021 [2]中国水电顾问集团成都勘测设计研究院,成都610072
出 处:《水土保持研究》2014年第1期81-84,共4页Research of Soil and Water Conservation
基 金:国家林业公益性行业科研专项"退耕还林等林业工程生态效益评价研究"(201304308)
摘 要:通过对八达岭林场油松、侧柏和刺槐枯落物储量调查分析和持水特性的研究,得到三种树种最大持水量、吸水速率和有效拦蓄量等水文特征参数。结果表明,枯落物储量为油松(29.2t/hm2)>刺槐(10.3t/hm2)>侧柏(4.7t/hm2),最大持水量为油松(61.4t/hm2)>侧柏(57.9t/hm2)>刺槐(43.2t/hm2),最大持水率为侧柏(471%)>油松(344%)>刺槐(196%),平均吸水速率为侧柏≥刺槐>油松,有效拦蓄量为刺槐>油松>侧柏。总的来说,侧柏、刺槐枯落物层保水功能相对要比油松好,侧柏枯落物层保水效果发挥最好。Maximum water holding capacity, water absorption speed and effective retaining content have been gotten through Surveying and analyzing litter reserves and researching on litter water retention characteristic for pinust abulaeformis, orientalis and robinia in Badaling forest center. Result showed that litter reserves were in the order of pinust abulaeformis(29.2 t/hm2))robinia(10. 3 t/hm2))orientalis(4. 7 t/hm2) ; maxi- mum water retention capacity followed the sequence of pinust abulaeformis(61.4 t/hm2 )〉orientalis(57.9 t/ hm2 ) ) robinia (43.2 t/hm2 ) ; maximum water holdup was in the order of orientalis ( 471 %) ) pinust abulae- formis(344%)〉robinia(196%) ; average water absorption speed was in the order of orientalis≥robinia〉pi- nust abulaeformis; effective retaining content was in the order of robinia)pinust abulaeformis)orientalis. In general, water conserving functions of orientalis and robinia were better than pinust abulaeformis, and water retention effect of orientalis showed the best.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80