法治国视野下行政行为对司法机关的效力  

On Effect of Administrative Decision for Judicial Organ in View of “Rechtsstaat”

作　　者：黄全[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国民航大学法学院,天津300300

出　　处：《河北法学》2014年第3期45-51,共7页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：中央高校科研基金专项<行政行为的效力与法律后果研究>(ZXH2010F004);天津市高等学校人文社会科学研究项目<行政行为效力制度研究>(20102710)

摘　　要：基于行政权与司法权的分工,行政行为与司法裁判行为是并行关系。一般情况下,非诉讼标的之行政行为对司法机关具有证据效力,即司法机关对行政行为的证据资格不得审查。例外情况是,当行政行为将直接影响相对人定罪量刑时,行政行为对司法机关具有选择性证据效力。According to the principle of separation of administrative power and judicial power, administrative decision should have parallel relation with judicial adjudicative decision. In general cases, administrative decision which is not the object of litigation has evidentiary effect for judicial organ, that is, judicial organ should not investigate administrative decision, bat approve it as evidence. As an exceptional case, when administrative decision has relation with conviction and sentencing, it should have selectively evidentiary effect for judicial organ.

关 键 词：行政行为 司法裁判 并行关系 诉讼标的 证据效力 

分 类 号：DF312[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]