检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘俐俐[1]
机构地区:[1]南开大学文学院
出 处:《文艺理论研究》2014年第1期165-174,共10页Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art
基 金:刘俐俐承担的天津市2012年度哲学社会科学规划课题"张爱玲小说艺术与中国文学传统"(TJZW12-002)成果
摘 要:论文由本雅明"讲故事的人"界定的悖论,对本雅明的"故事"概念过于狭窄产生了疑问。疑问来自作者既有的故事思考:故事始终与人类相伴随;故事是感性认识对象;故事可满足人类对意义的需求;故事具有适应人类需求、随条件变化而变化的特性。籍此,论文提出应建立人类学大视野的故事概念。论文选取本雅明认定的"讲故事的人"的俄国作家列斯科夫,以之与中国现代作家张爱玲比较分析。得出了如下结论:列斯科夫的故事是传统故事,传递经验以让人知道;张爱玲的故事是现代故事,传递体验以让人感悟,颠覆了本雅明所说的讲故事的人离我们远去了的断言。籍此就故事的变异与永恒问题形成如下基本看法:故事概念很大,小说概念应置于故事概念之下;故事给了小说各种故事讲法和风格以可能和机会,故事由此而变异;故事满足人类对意义需求的基本功能则永远不会变化;故事的人类学特质给予小说研究以新思路;呼吁关注和思考人类学大视野中故事的形而上思考与故事问题。This paper discusses Benjamin's paradox of "the story -teller" and questions the scope of his definition of the story. The premises for the question include : stories have always accompanied human activities ; stories are the cognitive objects of hu- man perception; stories meet people' s need for meaning; stories adapt themselves to the changes of human needs and cultural conditions. Thus, this paper proposes a broader definition of story from the perspective of anthropology and makes a comparative analysis on Russian novelist Nikolai Leskov who was called a" story - teller" by Walter Benjamin and modern Chinese novelist Ei- leen Chang. The paper observes that the stories of Leskov are traditional stories aiming at informing the readers while Chang' s stories are modern stories aiming at enlightening the readers. This undermines Benjamin' s assertion that story - tellers have gone from us. The paper therefore puts forward some initial views on the variations and eternals of stories. Firstly, story is a broad con- cept which should include the novel as a component. Secondly, story provides novels with various ways of telling stories, while the story form may vary. Thirdly, the basic function of story to meet man' s need for meaning never changes. Fourthly, the an- thropological features of story may provide new ideas for the study of novels. Finally, the paper concludes that there is an absolute necessity of metaphysical thinking about sto~ from the view of anthropology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.178.45