检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓蒙芝[1]
机构地区:[1]河南农业大学经济与管理学院,河南郑州450003
出 处:《沈阳农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第6期649-652,共4页Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金(71033003);中国博士后基金(2013M541978)
摘 要:农村公共物品供给模式差异是农村公共服务地区差距的本质体现。运用对江苏、四川、河北、吉林和陕西等五省100个行政村的跟踪调查数据,测算农村税费改革前后农村公共物品供给及其不同供给模式的"基尼系数"。结果发现:自税费改革实施以来,农村公共物品供给的地区差距逐步缩小,政府供给模式具有向贫困地区倾斜、缩小地区差距的效应,村庄自我供给模式具有明显的扩大地区差距的效应,"政府+村庄"联合供给模式具有持续增强扩大地区差距的效应。The supply mode difference of rural public goods essentially embodies the regional disparity of rural public services. The tracking survey data from 100 administrative villages in the provinces of Jiangsu, Sichuan, Hebei, Jilin and Shaanxi are used to measure and calculate the gini coefficient of the rural public goods supply and that of its different modes before and after the rural tax-fee reform was carried out. The results show that the regional disparity has been narrowing steadily since the rural tax&fee reform was carried out; the government supply mode has produced the effect of inclining to impoverished areas and narrowing the regional disparity; the village self-supply mode has obviously expanded the regional disparity; and the joint supply mode of government and village has kept the regional disparity expanding in some degree.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.72