地方性法规的行政审判“依据”地位质疑  

Querying the Administrative Trial Gists on Local Regulations

作　　者：林明民[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学研究生教育院,上海200042

出　　处：《湖州师范学院学报》2014年第1期46-51,共6页Journal of Huzhou University

摘　　要：我国《行政诉讼法》规定行政审判"依据"地方性法规,但《立法法》与司法解释却有不同的规定。司法实践并不认可地方性法规的审判"依据"地位,表现为适用上位法而绕过地方性法规,直接评判地方性法规的合法性等。文章认为在行政审判中,地方法院应主动审查待适用地方性法规的合法性,有权在个案中不适用违法的地方性法规。最高院应取得确认地方性法规违法的权力,可以宣布违法的地方性法规无效。Abstract. China＇s Administrative Procedure Law stipulates that administrative trial gists should base on local regulations, but the Legislation Law and judicial interpretation have different provisions. The basic status of local regulations is not recognized in judicial practice, reflecting that the courts avoid local regulations by applying the upper law, review the legitimacy of local regulations directly, etc. This paper argues that local courts should review the legitimacy of local regulations initiatively and refuse to apply illicit local regulations in administrative trial. The Supreme People＇s court should have the right of confirming the illegality of local regulations and declaring the illicit local regulations invalid.

关 键 词：行政审判 地方性法规 合法性审查 确认违法权 

分 类 号：D927[政治法律—法学]