检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡善联[1,2]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学公共卫生学院,上海200032 [2]上海市卫生发展研究中心,上海200040
出 处:《中国卫生政策研究》2014年第1期5-7,共3页Chinese Journal of Health Policy
摘 要:本文讨论了医师多点执业的内涵、该政策实行受阻的原因及对策。目前,我国公立医院的医师是"单位人",而不是"自由执业者",医院与医师均缺乏多点执业的动力,需要从立法、制度和政策三个方面来保障医师多点执业。大力发展私立医院、改善医师自由执业的条件是促进医师多点执业的重要前提。该政策的实行需要政府多部门和广大医师的参与,需要通过试点和实践检验做出循证决策。The paper discusses the contents of multiple-site physician practice, barriers, and ways to overcome difficulties. In China, a doctor in a public hospital belongs to the hospital. To some extent, they are not free professionals. Both hospitals (employer) and doctors (employee) lack the power to practise freely. In this paper, we suggest that multiple-site physician practice needs to be supported by legislation, institutions, and policies. The prerequisite is to vigorously develop private hospitals and improve conditions of multiple-site physician practice. Implementation of the policy requires a multiple-sector approach and the involvement of the majority of doctors. Evidence-based policy making is not possible unless it is done through pilot studies and practical experiment.
分 类 号:R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.48