气管切开患者ICU内肺部感染分析与护理对策  

The Lung Infections and Nursing Countermeasures in Tracheotomy Patients in ICU

作　　者：邝焕明[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州市红十字会医院,广东广州510000

出　　处：《中国医学创新》2014年第5期83-84,共2页Medical Innovation of China

摘　　要：目的:研究气管切开患者ICU内肺部感染与护理对策。方法:选择2010年3月-2013年1月本院接诊的80例ICU内气管切开合并肺部感染患者进行研究,随机均分为实验组和对照组两组。对照组采用常规的护理措施,实验组采用系统护理方案。采用相关疗效评价标准对两组患者的护理效果进行比较分析,并对两组患者的并发症发生情况进行记录分析。结果:实验组患者护理干预的效果明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(字2=5.1647,P=0.0231)。实验组患者满意度明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(字2=6.2745,P=0.0122)。实验组患者的并发症发生率(5.0%)明显低于对照组(27.5%),两组比较差异有统计学意义(字2=7.4397,P=0.0064)。结论:采用系统性护理干预措施对ICU内气管切开合并肺部感染患者实施护理,效果良好。Objective：To study the tracheotomy in ICU patients with pulmonary infection and nursing. Method：80 cases of hospital admissions tracheotomy in ICU patients with pulmonary infection from March 2010 to January 2013 were studied,and they were randomly divided into experimental and control groups.Control group were treated with conventional measures of care for patients with care,the experimental group were used the system of care programs on patient care. After nursing intervention,the clinical curative effect of two groups were analyzed and compared by related curative effect evaluation standard,and the complications were studied. Result：The total efficiency of the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group,there was statistically significant（X2=5.1647,P=0.0231）.The patient satisfaction of the experimental group was significantly better than that in the control group,there was statistically significant（X2=6.2745,P=0.0122）.The incidence of complications of the experimental group（5.0%）was significantly lower than that in the control group（27.5%）,there was statistically significant（X2=7.4397,P=0.0064）. Conclusion：Systematic nursing interventions has good effect on tracheotomy in ICU patients with pulmonary infection.

关 键 词：气管切开 肺部感染 护理 

分 类 号：R473[医药卫生—护理学]