从Optus案看云计算环境下版权法“时移”规则的变迁  

“Time-Shifting”in the Cloud Computing Era: Analysis on the Optus Case

作　　者：徐彦冰[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学法学院,上海200240

出　　处：《暨南学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第1期35-42,161,共8页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目<云计算知识产权问题研究>(批准号:12YJAZH116);上海交通大学文理交叉专项基金重点项目<云计算知识产权问题研究>(批准号:11JCZ04);国家法治与法学理论研究项目<云计算相关版权问题与对策研究>(批准号:13SFB5028)

摘　　要：早在学者关注和立法调整之前,云存储和云服务的合法性就以判例的方式经过了司法审查。有关云计算的判例,在美国、新加坡和德国都有发生,而2012年4月澳大利亚全席法庭在Optus案做出的判决与2008年美国第二巡回法院在Cablevision案做出的判决并不相同,Optus案的判决影响了云计算环境下版权法"时移"规则,得出"云服务提供者进行复制"的结论。云计算给版权法带来很多新问题,"时移"规则只是沧海一粟,版权法在面对这些问题时,应作着眼权利人,作品利用人,技术提供者之间利益平衡。Before the attention of scholars and the legislative adjustment,the legality of cloud computing has been passed the judicial review by the way of legal precedent. There have been legal precedents regarding the cloud computing in United States,Singapore and Germany. But there is difference between the judgment of Optus case by the Full Court of Austrial in April 2012 and the one of Cablevision case by the Second Circuit Court of United States in 2008. Due to the analysis on the judgment of Optus case,this paper is to discuss the evolution of 'time-shifting ' rule of copyright law under the cloud computing and explore the possible countermeasures for the legislation and judicature to handle the cases regarding the 'cloud computing'.

关 键 词：云计算 版权 “时移”规则 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]