检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜燕红[1] 龚建明[1] 范建明[1] 顾俊[1] 罗志渊[1] 徐琴[1] 须海丰
机构地区:[1]江苏省太仓市中医医院肛肠科,江苏太仓215400
出 处:《中国肛肠病杂志》2014年第1期37-38,共2页Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
基 金:江苏省中医药管理局科研项目(LZ11155)苏州市科技局科研项目(SYSD2011042)
摘 要:为探讨新型胶圈套扎器治疗混合痔的临床疗效,将200例混合痔患者随机分为两组,各100例,治疗组采用新型胶圈套扎术治疗,对照组采用传统外剥内扎术治疗。观察两组手术时间,创口愈合时间,术后疼痛、出血、水肿等情况。结果显示,两组患者治愈率均达90%以上,无显著性差异,但在手术时间、术后疼痛、水肿、创口愈合时间等方面,治疗组优于对照组。结果表明,新型胶圈套扎术与外剥内扎术相比,操作简单,手术时间短,术后疼痛、水肿轻微,恢复较快,并发症少。This study was to discuss the clinical efficacy of new rubber band ligation device in treating mixed hemorrhoids. The 200 cases in the study were randomized into treatment group and control group, 100 cases for each. Treatment group received rubber band ligation for internal hemorrhoids and control group underwent conventional external dissection and internal ligation. Both groups were observed for op- eration time, wound healing time, postoperative pain, bleeding and edema. The results showed thats the cur- ative rate were over 90% in both groups,without showing significant difference;but treatment group was superior to control group in operation time,wound healing time,postoperative pain, bleeding and edema. It is concluded that compared with external dissection and internal ligation, new rubber band ligation is of simple manipulation, shorter operation time, less postoperative pain and edema, rapid recovery and fewer complications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.44.233