检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡志刚[1] 侯海燕[1] 侯剑华[2] 赵楠楠[1]
机构地区:[1]大连理工大学科学学与科技管理研究所,辽宁大连116024 [2]大连大学人文学部,辽宁大连116622
出 处:《科技进步与对策》2014年第3期7-13,共7页Science & Technology Progress and Policy
摘 要:通过对科学学领域9种核心期刊的文献计量学分析,描绘了2009-2011年科学学领域的新特点和新趋向,列出了科学学研究中的主要研究热点、上升最快和下降最快的研究方向、高产作者及其研究方向、高产机构及其研究方向等。从研究主题来看,科学学领域的研究主题基本保持稳定,但是一些反映时代特点的旧研究主题,如"WTO"、"知识经济"等,正在被新的研究热点,如"低碳经济"、"金融危机"、"战略性新兴产业"所取代;从研究人员来看,科学学领域的高产作者群存在明显的新陈代谢,新的高产作者替代了旧的高产作者;从研究机构来看,各高产研究机构均匀分布在各大主要城市,而研究主题则集中在"技术创新"、"自主创新"、"知识管理"等主流研究领域。This article aims to reveal the new features and directions in the field of Science of Science(SOS) during 2009- 2011. By conducting bibliometric analysis on nine journals in this field, we list hottest topics, the most rising and falling topics, the most productive authors and institution along with their research field. We conclude that: In the terms of re- search topics, the topics of this field remained stable. However, some hot topics that reflect the characteristics of the past time, such as "WTO", "knowledge economy", have been replaced by the new topics, like?"low-carbon economy ", "fi- nancial crisis ", "strategic emerging industries" . In the terms of academic groups, metabolism phenomenon of authors in this field was discovered. Old productive authors were replaced by the new productive authors. In the terms of academic institutions, highly productive institutions are evenly distributed among the cities in China. Most of them focus on the top- ics such as "technological innovation", "independent innovation", "knowledge management" and so on.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28