检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东北大学信息科学与工程学院,辽宁沈阳110819 [2]东北大学网络中心,辽宁沈阳110819
出 处:《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》2014年第2期195-198,共4页Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(61101121)
摘 要:为了探究Internet拓扑动态节点演化特征的层级相关性,基于CAIDA项目授权的海量数据,结合网络科学的思想,分析了不同尺度下网络结构的演化机制.针对IP级与AS级拓扑,对层级与节点动态特性的相关性进行了分析,其中包括新生与消亡节点的动态变化比例、偏好依附、稳定连接数目等多个特性.结果表明:IP级拓扑节点的新陈代谢比AS级旺盛,IP级拓扑新生节点的非优先连接"偏好"比AS级稳定,新生连接中IP级拓扑的稳定连接数较多.IP级与AS级动态节点的演化有本质不同,为理解Internet的演化机制提供了基础.Introducing network science theories, the evolution mechanisms of different network scales were analyzed based on lots of data provided by the CAIDA project. As to the topologies of IP-level and AS-level, the correlation between the two levels and the characteristics of dynamic nodes were analyzed, including the dynamically changing proportion of birth/death nodes, preferential attachments and the number of stable attachments. The conclusions are as follows: firstly, IP-level nodes are more active; secondly, the evolution of IP-level non-preferential attachments is more stable, and thirdly, the number of IP-level stable attachments is much greater. The evolutions of the dynamic nodes in different measure levels are different in essence, which can provide a valid basis for understanding the Internet evolution mechanism.
分 类 号:TP393.02[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90