从格赖斯循环到显含义之争——语义—语用分水岭问题  

From Grice's Circle to the Disputes About Explicature and Implicature:Semantics-Pragmatics Interface Conundrum

作　　者：侯国金[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川外国语大学外国语文研究中心,重庆400031

出　　处：《外国语文》2013年第6期80-87,共8页Foreign Languages and Literature

基　　金：四川外国语大学和国家社科基金项目"语用翻译学:寓意言谈翻译研究"(sisu201209;12BYY017);教育部社科项目"词汇-构式语用学:语用翻译学的第一座桥"(12XJA740008)的前期成果

摘　　要：本文试图梳理和厘清经典和焦点的语义—语用界面问题。首先讨论了林林种种的意义问题和格赖斯循环问题,讨论了意义的三分:显义、半隐义和含义及其差别。文章以and的个案研究考察了关于言说和含义的争论,关于显义、半隐义和含义的争论,关于真值条件是否或多大程度受到了语用侵入,着重介绍了关联论者的显义观、Bach的半隐义观、Levinson的新格赖斯会话含义观以及语用学局外人士的看法。The thesis attempts to hackle and clarify the classical focal semantics-pragmatics interface matters. It commences with miscellaneous meaning issues and Grice＇ s Circle problems, followed by a discussion of the tripartite classification ： explicature, impliciture and implicature, with their differences. By a case study of the word and, the thesis investigates the disputes over ＂what is said＂ and ＂what is implicated＂, over the above-mentioned tripartite classification, and over whether or how much truth-conditional content is affected by pragmatic intrusion. Then highlighted is the relevance-theoretical explicature view, Bach＇ s impliciture view, and Levinson＇ s neo-Gricean conversational implieature view, followed by a scant review of outsiders＇ points of views.

关 键 词：语义—语用界面 言说 显义 含义 语用侵入 

分 类 号：H313[语言文字—英语]