检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国矿业大学力学与建筑工程学院,江苏徐州221116
出 处:《地下空间与工程学报》2014年第1期163-169,共7页Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金重点项目(50834004);国家自然科学基金项目(50874104)
摘 要:随着煤矿开采深度的增加,矿山压力逐渐增强,软岩巷道比例迅速增加,类似U型棚等可缩性支架被广泛的应用在该类巷道支护当中而成为主要的支护形式。基于ANSYS软件对不同结构的矿用U型棚进行分析,研究不同拱角和加底梁对U型棚位移、应力和应变的影响规律,从而得到了支护最优的U型棚设计方案。根据模拟优化结果,非封闭U型棚采用拱角30°的设计具有较好的强度和支护效果,封闭U型棚采用拱角15°的设计更有利于支护,这可为深部或软岩巷道U型棚支护提供一定的理论指导。With the increase of mining depth, the mine pressure becomes stronger gradually, the proportion of soft rock roadway increases rapidly, the U-type shed is widely applied in roadway support and becomes the main form of support in such roadway. In this paper based on ANSYS numerical simulation software, according to the change of the displacement, stress and strain, the different arched U-type shed and the influence of the closed U-type shed' s rigidity enhancement for getting the design of U-type shed with respect to the best supporting stiffness were studied. Based on the results by simulation and optimization, for non dosed shed, the design with 30°arch angle is good in the roadway support; for closed one, the design with 15° arch angle is better in the roadway support. The result will pro- vide some theoretical guidance for the deep or soft rock roadway support.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117