检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华东交通大学人文社会科学学院,江西南昌330013
出 处:《华东交通大学学报》2013年第6期89-93,共5页Journal of East China Jiaotong University
基 金:江西省社科规划项目(10FX11);江西省高校人文社科重点项目(FX1104)
摘 要:我国驰名商标司法认定应遵循按需认定、被动认定和个案有效的原则,根据商标的知晓程度、宣传的时间性和地域性、受保护的记录和声誉等等标准认定。但实践中,由于法律规定的缺陷以及人们对于驰名商标的认识不足等原因,使得驰名商标司法认定暴露出一些问题,其中虚假诉讼的泛滥最为典型。针对这些问题提出了改进驰名商标实行司法认定的建议。The judicial determination of well-known trademarks should follow the principles of determination according to the demand,passive determination and case-identified determination,and it should also consider the popularity,the specific period and region of the publicity,the record of being protected and the overall repu-tation of the specific trademark. However,in practice,due to flaws in laws and regulations and the limitation of people’s understandings of well-known trademarks,certain problems are revealed in the process of judicial de-termination of well-known trademarks,among which fraud litigation is the most typical problem. In order to solve those problems,specific suggestions are proposed in this paper.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117