两种化验室静脉采血后拔针按压法效果比较  

Comparison on the Effect of Two Different Pressing Methods after Extraction of Venous Blood Collection Needle

作　　者：程丽娟 

机构地区：[1]东至县计划生育服务站,安徽247299

出　　处：《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》2014年第1期102-102,104,共2页Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College

摘　　要：目的:比较化验室静脉采血后传统拔针按压法与改良拔针按压法的效果。方法:随机抽取200对来站要求静脉采血化验对象男女混搭均分成改良组(n=200)和对照组(n=200),改良组采用改良拔针按压法,对照组采用传统拔针按压法,比较两组拔针后并发症的发生率。结果:改良组对象拔针后疼痛和穿刺点出血、皮下淤血的发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:改良式拔针按压法减少了静脉采血拔针后的并发症,值得推广。Objective：Comparison of the Effect of the traditional pressing method and the modified Pressing method after extraction of venous blood collection needle.Method：200 pairs of cases undergoing venous blood collec-tion are divided into an improved group （200 cases） and a control group（200 cases） randomly. The cases in the improved group use the traditional pressing method while the cases in control group use the improved pressing method. The inci-dence of complication after the withdrawal of needles is compared. Result：The incidence of pain, hemorrhage at the point of puncture and hypodermic gore in the cases of the improved group is obviously lower than in the control group P＆lt;0.01, and there are statistical significance between these two groups.Conclusion：The improved Pressing Method can reduce complications after extraction of venous blood collection needle. Meanwhile, this method with popularizing.

关 键 词：拔针按压法 并发症 服务质量 

分 类 号：R472.9[医药卫生—护理学]