检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄燕辉[1]
出 处:《北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第1期96-101,共6页JOURNAL OF BEIJING TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS UNIVERSITY:SOCIAL SCIENCES
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"我国货币政策的区域经济效应研究"(08JJD790136)
摘 要:近年来关注金融约束理论的学者日益增多,但存在对金融约束政策含义的误解以及缺乏对其在中国实践状况的深入分析。文章在分析该理论基本框架基础上,重点强调其特许权价值、专利权保护及私营部门的真正含义,以消除前人的误解;首次深入分析金融约束理论在我国的实践情况,包括前提条件满足状况和具体表现,以期给后续相关研究提供借鉴;最后分析了金融约束政策是导致我国中小企业融资困境产生的主要原因并提出政策建议。Recently, more and more scholars have paid attention to financial restraint theory. However, there are misunder- standings for the policy implication of financial restraint and there is a lack of deep analysis of its practices in China. This paper analyzes the basic framework of financial restraint theory, focusing on the connotation of franchise value, patent protection and private sectors to eliminate the previous misunderstandings. For the first time, this paper makes a deep analysis of the practices of financial restraint theory in China, including the premise condition and concrete embodiment, in a hope of providing reference for subsequent researches. Finally, it analyzes the main reasons from financial restraint policy which leads to the financing dilemma of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and proposes the policy suggestions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.171.249