从“后常规科学”看环境风险治理的技治主义误区  

On the Plight of Technocracy in Environmental Risk Management from Post-normal Science Perspective

作　　者：薛桂波[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京林业大学江苏环境与发展研究中心,江苏南京210037

出　　处：《吉首大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第1期42-47,共6页Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC720050);江苏省社会科学基金项目(13ZXB008);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(11SJB05)

摘　　要：传统的环境风险治理,主要采取的是基于"常规科学"方法的技治主义模式,旨在以"技术统治论"寻求关于风险的确定性、真理性的科学结论。当前,科学已经进入"后常规"时代,环境风险的不确定性和复杂性程度极大提高,原有的"常规科学"方法已经在某种程度上失去其合理性,技治主义治理模式的弊端和局限性日益显现。应充分认识"后常规科学"的特点,适当调整权威式、中心式的精英决策过程,超越技治主义误区,建构多元开放型的科学家-政府-公众联合治理模式,才能真正提高环境风险治理的实效。The traditional way to deal with environmental risks is technocracy with the basic method of normal science. With the increasing uncertainty and complexity of environmental risks under the back- ground of big science, the technocracy has been unable to respond effectively to environmental challenges. However, the current environmental risk management still sticks to normal science ,and tech- nocracy has been the governance model, causing the increasingly apparent drawbacks and limitations. Therefore, from the post-normal science perspective, we should go beyond the technocracy and establish a system of cooperation among scientists, government and the public in order to improve the effectiveness of environmental risk management.

关 键 词：后常规科学 环境风险治理 技治主义 

分 类 号：D630[政治法律—政治学]