检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《湖北第二师范学院学报》2014年第1期63-65,共3页Journal of Hubei University of Education
基 金:广西民族大学研究生教育创新计划资助项目(gxun-chx2013027);广西研究生教育创新计划资助项目(YCSW2013062)
摘 要:行政诉讼举证责任是行政诉讼证据制度的核心问题,举证责任的分配直接关系到行政诉讼价值目标的顺利实现。本文通过文献研究的方法从被告举证责任的分配、原告举证责任的分配、举证责任分配困境方面对现有的成果进行梳理,为后人深入探讨行政诉讼举证责任分配问题开辟一条快速进入其前沿领域的途径。The burden of proof in administrative litigation is the core problem in the evidence system of administrative litigation, and directly affects the smooth realization of the value target of administrative litigation. In recent years, there are a lot of valuable research results in the field. Through literature research methods, this article tries to classify the distribution of burden of proof on the accused, the allocation of burden of proof on the plaintiff, the allocation of the bur- den of proof difficulties on the existing achievements, so as to open up a quick access to its frontier way for the later gen- erations to deeply explore the burden of proof in administrative litigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229