基于两种数据传输途径的国家级地面自动站逐小时数据差异分析  

Differences analysis of historical hourly meteorological data from national basic automatic weather stations due to use of two types of transportation data format

作　　者：张志富[1] 任芝花[1] 邹凤玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]国家气象信息中心,北京100081

出　　处：《气象与环境学报》2014年第1期64-68,共5页Journal of Meteorology and Environment

基　　金：国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2010CB951600);国气象局气象关键技术集成与应用项目(CAMGJ2014M69);公益性行业(气象)科研专项(GYHY201106038);国气象局气象新技术推广项目(CMATG2008Z12);中国气象局基建项目"全国自动站实时资料质量控制与综合评估系统建设"共同资助

摘　　要：对2006—2009年两种途径(A文件和Z文件)上传的2400多个国家级自动站观测的小时常规6要素资料进行对比分析。结果表明:两种途径的小时数据中,2 min风和10 min风的不一致率较高,主要由于两种文件对风速为零时风向的规定不同造成,其他要素的不一致率相对较低;在不一致数据中,各要素在仪器误差允许范围内的不一致率气温为23.27%、气压为5.40%、相对湿度为23.19%、降水为65.42%、2 min风为12.93%、10 min风为14.16%。The hourly data of 6 routine meteorological elements at 2400 national automatic weather stations from 2006 to 2009 were compared, and the data were obtained by A files and Z files （ two types of data transport meth- ods）. The results indicate that the hourly 2 min and 10 min wind data from two methods are significantly different because of the different artificial decisions for the wind direction when the wind speed is zero, while the other ele- ments from the two methods have relatively small difference. For the different data in two methods, the rates of temperature,air pressure,relative humidity,precipitation,2 min and 10 min winds within the instrumental error ran- ges are 23.27% ,5.4% ,23.19% ,65.42% ,12. 93% and 14. 16% ,respectively.

关 键 词：A文件 Z文件 不一致率 

分 类 号：P413[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]