无权占有和间接占有的两个基本问题——与李锡鹤教授商榷  

Two Basic Issues of Unauthorized Possession and Indirect Possession——Discussing with Prof. Li Xihe

作　　者：章正璋[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215006 [2]苏州大学东吴公法与比较法研究所,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《学术界》2014年第2期102-108,308,共7页Academics

基　　金：2013年度教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"物权法与侵权法对占有的二元保护机制研究(13YJA820071)"的阶段性成果

摘　　要：人民法院司法实践中一贯坚持占有是事实而非权利,无论是有权占有还是无权占有,甚或是权属不明或者权属有争议之占有,均可享受占有之诉的保护。除私力救济外,争议中的任何一方无权单方面改变占有之现状。赃款、赃物的追缴应该通过行政处罚程序或者刑事诉讼程序予以解决,不应该通过占有之诉予以解决。间接占有具有重要的理论意义和实践价值,早已为我国司法解释和司法实践所接受,其存在不违背任何法理。In the nature possession belongs to one kind of facts,it's not one kind of rights. According to the current judicial practice of the people's courts,no matter legislative possession,unauthorized possession、disputed possession or the owner is unknown,all kinds of possession share the protection of possessory action. The legal protection of possession and the legal protection of rights form the dual legal protection system of possession. The illicit money,booty and spoils schould be recovered in criminal actions and in administrative punishment procedures,not in the possessory actions.Indirect possession possesses great significance in practice and deserve recognition.

关 键 词：无权占有 间接占有 占有保护 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]