检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘国栋[1]
机构地区:[1]商洛学院城乡发展与管理工程系,商洛726000
出 处:《建筑知识:学术刊》2014年第B03期259-260,共2页Architectural Knowledge
基 金:商洛学院科研项目(13SKY004)
摘 要:通过有限元结合极限平衡法计,对一均质土边坡进行了安全系数的计算,比较了极限平衡法、有限元强度折减法和有限元结合极限平衡法得到的安全系数,得到各种方法的差别。在有限元结合极限平衡法中引入吸力摩擦角,分析了吸力摩擦角对边坡稳定安全系数的影响。结论认为,有限元强度折减法中采用等效面积圆屈服准则的计算结果和有限元结合极限平衡法很吻合,验证了本文中方法的合理性;对不同的坡比,吸力摩擦角增大时安全系数呈平行的直线上升,滑坡方量呈阶段性的上升,最后趋于稳定。The limit equilibrium method was used to compute the safety factor. By this way, the safety factor of a homogenous soil slope was calculated, and the factors of limit equilibrium method, strength reduction FEM, the FEM within limit equilibrium method were compared. The suction friction angle was absorbed into the FEM within limit equilibrium method, analyzed the affection of suction friction angle on the slope's safety factor. At last, the conclusion was drawn that the strength reduction FEM should be used with the equivalent area yield criterion. In addition, the reliability of the FEM within limit equilibrium method was proved. As the suction friction angle increasing, the safety factor straight climb, and the volume of sliding mass stage accend.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15