检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院
出 处:《经济学(季刊)》2014年第1期583-600,共18页China Economic Quarterly
摘 要:本文试图为内生权威问题提供一个可资参考的初步的模型,分析组织在什么条件下采用权威决策规则,在什么条件下采用多数制决策规则。我们发现:权威均衡要求群体成员间的利益分歧足够小,还要求存在一定的交流成本;同时拥有认知优势的一方获得权威。多数制均衡要求群体成员间的利益分歧足够大,交流成本较小。此外,如果权威决策规则是唯一的纳什均衡,那么它是有效率的,而多数制决策规则未必是有效率的。The paper tries to develop a preliminary model for reference for the issues of endogenous authority by analyzing the conditions for authoritative decision-making rule and majority decision-making rule, respectively within an organization. We have obtained some interesting findings: decision by authority requires small interest divergence and some com- munication cost among group members, and the party with cognitive advantageswill obtain the authority. Decision by voting demands big interest divergence and less communication- cost. If authoritative decision-making rule is the unique Nash equilibrium, it holds the effi- ciency as well. However, majority decision-making rule may not be efficient.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117