检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钱小亮[1] 楚建杰[1] 赵先[1] 胡冬梅[1] 郭虎宁[1] 文爱东[1]
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学西京医院药剂科,西安710000
出 处:《抗感染药学》2014年第1期46-48,共3页Anti-infection Pharmacy
基 金:国家863课题(编号:NO.2012AA02A603);全军"十一五"重大专项课题(编号:NO.06D007)
摘 要:目的:分析西京医院干预前后泌尿外科门诊慢性前列腺炎的药物治疗使用情况。方法:对照组采用2012年6月—2012年11月间就诊患者的用药处方,干预组则采用2012年12月—2013年5月间用药处方,对就诊患者干预治疗前后的用药情况进行对比分析。结果:治疗慢性前列腺炎3 114张处方中,其中使用最多为植物类制剂,对照组不合理处方率为9.41%,干预组为1.16%,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:门诊慢性前列腺炎用药情况基本合理,干预用药后其合理性有明显改善。Objective: To analyze the usage of drugs in patients with chronic prostatitis before and alter interven- tion in urology departmed of Xijing hospital. Methods: Prescriptions to the patients with chronic prostatitis from June 2012 to November 2012 were adopted in the control group and prescriptions from December 2012 to May 2013 were adopted to the intervention group. The usage of drugs before and after intervention was contrastively analyzed. Results: There are 3114 prescriptions of chronic prostatitis treatment, of which plant preparations were mostly used. The irratio- nality rate of prescription is 9.41% in the control group while it is 1.16% in the intervention group ,and the difference is statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion: The use of medication of chronic prostatitis is reasonable in urology clinic of Xijing hospital. The rationality of drug use has been improved significantly after intervention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117