检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽理工大学法学研究所,安徽淮南232001
出 处:《西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第2期78-82,共5页Journal of Xihua University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
基 金:安徽省人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(SK2013B148)
摘 要:从法经济学的视角看,我国反垄断法存在法律责任主体和种类不完整、追究违法者缺乏效率与激励、违法成本低的问题。完善我国反垄断法的法律责任,应抑制市场主体的经济人属性,增加法律责任的主体,完善法律责任的形式,完善对违法者的追究机制,加大违法成本。Problems exist in legal responsibility of China's anti-monopoly law from law and economics perspective, such as incompletion of subject and type of legal responsibility, lack of efficiency and incentive of investigating violators, and low cost of breaking the law. To perfect the legal liability of anti-monopoly law in our country, the attribute of economic man of market subjects should be restrained, and following measures should be taken: Firstly, subject of legal responsibility should be increased. Secondly, form of responsibility should be improved. Thirdly, investigating violators should be strengthened. Lastly, cost of breaking the law should be increased.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30