浅谈《明儒学案》的文献选择——以颜均、何心隐、陈九川为例  

On the choice of "Ming Confucianism Case" Literature ——Take Yan,He Xinyin,Chen Jiuchuan as an example

作　　者：姚文永[1] 

机构地区：[1]运城学院政法系,山西运城044000

出　　处：《运城学院学报》2014年第1期9-12,共4页Journal of Yuncheng University

基　　金：运城学院院级项目(HY-2011013);2011年姚奠中国学教育基金项目(2011GX10);2012教育部人文社科青年项目(12YJC770065)

摘　　要：学案体由案主简介、案主评价、案主资料汇编三部分组成。《明儒学案》亦是如此。从《明儒学案》案主资料汇编方面看,黄宗羲对绝大多数著者的案主资料汇编都是合理的。然书目繁多,一人能力有限,对一些文献看不到也是正常的。从颜均、何心隐、陈九川的例子看,黄宗羲对文献的选择的确又是存在问题的,要么没有看到,要么视而不见。纵然瑕不掩瑜,但这终究是《明儒学案》的不完美之处,这也是我们后人阅读《明儒学案》所应注意的。The body of the academic case consists of three parts： an introduction to the writer, an evalua- tion on the writer, and data collection tff the writer, and so is the ＂Ming Confucianism case＂. From the data col- lection of the writers of the ＂ Ming Confucianism case＂, the vast majority of the cases data compilation by Huang Zongxi is reasonable. However, it is normal that some of the literature was neglected due to many a bibliogra- phy, and limited capacity. From the examples of Yan Jun, He Xinyin, and Chen Jiuchuan, Huang Zongxi is in- deed problematic on the document selection, whether he failed to see them, or paid no heed. All in all, it is im- perfections of the ＂Ming Confucianism case＂ eventually; therefore, this is what we should pay attention to while reading ＂Ming Confucianism case＂.

关 键 词：《明儒学案》 文献 黄宗羲 

分 类 号：K248[历史地理—历史学]