检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第一医院麻醉科,广东广州510080
出 处:《实用医院临床杂志》2014年第2期3-5,共3页Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的比较患者蛛网膜下腔注射左旋布比卡因与布比卡因的运动神经阻滞效应。方法择期腰硬联合麻醉下拟行泌尿外科腔镜手术患者60例,年龄18~64岁,ASA分级I或Ⅱ级,按随机数字表法分为0.5%左旋布比卡因组和0.5%布比卡因组(n=30),按照序贯法进行试验,阻滞有效,则下一例患者采用低一级剂量,阻滞无效,则下一例患者采用高一级剂量,初始剂量均为4mg,剂量梯度1mg,阻滞有效的标准:蛛网膜下腔给药后5或10min任一下肢的运动神经阻滞评分〉0分。采用序贯法计算蛛网膜下腔注射左旋布比卡因或布比卡因运动神经阻滞的半数有效剂量(ED50)。结果患者蛛网膜下腔注射左旋布比卡因和布比卡因运动神经阻滞的ED50及其95%置信区间分别为6.68(6.27,7.13)mg和5.06(4.56,5.47)mg,效力比为0.76。结论患者蛛网膜下腔注射左旋布比卡因运动神经阻滞效力小于布比卡因。Objective To compare the ED50values for motor block with subarachnoid injection of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine. Methods Sixty patients aged 18 - 64 years old who were undergone the elective urological surgery with combined spinal-epi- dural(CSE) anesthesia were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomized divided into two groups. The patients received the spinal injection of 0. 5 % levobupivacaine ( group I, n = 30 ) or 0. 5 % bupivacaine ( group II , n = 30 ). By using a sequential technique, varying doses of levobupivacaine or bupivacaine were administered. The efficacy of the studied drug was assessed by using a modified Bromage scale and the hip motor function scale at 5 min or 10 min. ED50was estimated by the up-and-down method. Results The motor block ED50 for the group I was 6. 68 mg ( 95 % CI 6. 27 - 7. 13 ) and for the group II was 5.06 mg ( 95 % Cl 4. 56 - 5.47 ). The relative motor blocking potency ratios were 0. 76. Conclusion The EDs0for motor block of subarachnoid injection of levobupivacaine was lower than that of bupivacaine.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3