单采献血中人文关怀护理与传统护理效果的比较  被引量:5

The comparison of nursing efficacy between humanistic concern care and traditional nursing care during the process of plateletapheresis

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:曹英[1] 吴次宁[1] 田浩[1] 喻科[1] 白黎[1] 林敏[1] 徐香兰[1] 席光湘[1] 

机构地区:[1]成都市血液中心,四川成都610081

出  处:《实用医院临床杂志》2014年第2期127-128,共2页Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine

摘  要:目的探讨人文关怀护理模式在单采献血过程中的应用效果。方法将120例在我站初次单采献血者依数字随机法分为两组各60例。观察组采用人文关怀护理模式,对照组采用传统护理模式,比较两组献血者的采集时间、不良反应发生率、采集成功率及献血者满意度。结果观察组的采集时间短于对照组,不良反应发生率低于对照组,采集成功率和满意度均明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对初次单采献血者从人文关怀角度进行护理,能明显缩短单采时间,减少不良反应发生率,提高采集成功率和献血者满意度.Objective To compare the nursing efficacy between humanistic concern and traditional nursing during the process of plateletapheresis.Methods A total of 120 first time blood donors were randomly divided into two groups,60 in each group. Subjects in observational group received humanistic concern care, while those in control group received conventional nursing care. Duration of blood donation time, rate of adverse events, rate of donation success, and degree of satisfaction in the donation process were compared between the two groups. Results The duration of blood donation time was shorter, the rate of adverse events was lower, and the rate of donation success was higher in the group received humanistic concern care than that in the group received conventional nursing care( all P 〈 0. 05). Conclusion Humanistic concern care should be encouraged, especially those without previous history of blood donation.

关 键 词:人文关怀 单采 护理 

分 类 号:R472[医药卫生—护理学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象