检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《南京大学学报(自然科学版)》2001年第1期104-113,共10页Journal of Nanjing University(Natural Science)
摘 要:与传统的静荷载试验相比,高应变动力试桩拟合法是一种非常方便实用的分析技术,但该技术非常复杂,它的成功应用取决于诸多因素.通过剖析高应变动力试桩法的原理和拟合法的实质,结合工程实例,指出高应变动力试桩拟合法确定桩承载力不仅理论模型本身较静荷载试验存在差异,而且在数据处理过程中由于参数选择不同将引起承载力结果的误差.同时,人员素质也是准确应用该方法并给出合理结论的关键高应变动力试桩拟合法误差来源的分析,对该法在实际应用过程中避免或减少可能产生的失误将是十分有益的.Comparison with traditional static load test, the curve match method of high strain dynamic testing on pile much effective analysis technique, with many factors entering into successful test. With the examples, based on the principium of high strain dynamic testing on pile and the essence of the curve match, this paper shows that there are some disparities on high strain model to determine load capacity of pile campared with static load test, that some errors will arrive when we choose variable parameters in indoor data handling, that the engineer also is key to applying the method in the correct way and interpreting results reasonably. The analysis of error sources in the curve match of high strain dynamic testing on pile has a certain significance in avoiding or reducing potential misplay.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229