检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘丽
机构地区:[1]石河子市第八师一四三团医院,新疆石河子832023
出 处:《中外医学研究》2014年第8期31-32,共2页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
摘 要:目的:观察并探讨3种抗生素治疗急性阑尾炎的临床疗效。方法:选取笔者所在医院2011年2月-2013年2月收治的100例患有急性阑尾炎的患者,按随机数字表法分为三组,A组35例采用头孢类抗生素治疗方案,B组33例采用青霉素类抗生素治疗方案,C组32例采用氨基苷类抗生素治疗方案,7 d后对比分析疗效。结果:A组总有效率85.71%,B组总有效率87.88%,C组总有效率87.50%,三组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:三种抗生素治疗急性阑尾炎均具有较好疗效,值得在临床上应用。Objective:To observe and discuss the clinical curative effect of 3 kinds of antibiotics in the treatment of acute appendicitis.Method:A total of 100 patients with acute appendicitis in our hospital from February 2011 to February 2013 were randomly divided into three groups,and 35 patients in group A were treated with cephalosporin antibiotic therapy,and 33 patients in group B were treated with penicillins antibiotic therapy,and 32 patients in group C were treated with aminoglycoside antibiotic therapy,and the curative effect after 7 days were compared and analyzed.Result:The total effective rate of group A was 85.71%,and the total effective rate of group B was 87.88%,and the total effective rate of group C was 87.50%,and that in three groups were compared,and differences were not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion:The curative effects of 3 kinds of antibiotics in the treatment of acute appendicitis are better,and they are all worthy of clinical applicating.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158