中国地方志目录平议  

Comments on China Local Records Bibliographies

作　　者：任利荣[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川省成都市四川大学历史文化学院,610016

出　　处：《中国地方志》2014年第2期17-22,共6页China Local Records

摘　　要：目前具有代表意义的地方志目录有《中国地方志综录》《中国地方志联合目录》《中国地方志总目提要》《稀见地方志提要》,以及《中国古籍善本书目》《续修四库全书总目提要》《北京图书馆古籍善本书目》《北京图书馆藏普通古籍总目》中的方志部分,从编纂和著录体例,以及考订和著录的准确性方面比较,各种目录各具优劣。编纂地方志目录应采取比较科学合理的体例,应注意五个方面的问题,即:1.地方志的排序问题;2.地方志书名的著录;3.地方志责任者的著录;4.地方志版本的著录;5.地方志内容提要的纂写。此外,还对现有地方志目录的部分考订错误进行辨证。Currently representative local records bibliographies has China Local Records Comprehensive Bibliography,China Local Records Combined Bibliography,Summary of China Local Records General Catalogue,and Summary of Rare Local Records,along with the local records parts of Catalogue of Refined Editions of Ancient Chinese Books,Summary of the General Catalogue of Continued Si Ku Quan Shu(Complete Collection of the Four Treasures of Knowledge),Catalogue of Refined Editions of Ancient Books in Beijing Library,and General Catalogue of Ordinary Ancient Books in Beijing Library,comparing from the angle of compilation and authorship styles and preciseness of textual examination and authorship,Various bibliographies have competitive strengths and weaknesses.Local records bibliography compilation should adopt the relatively scientific and reasonable styles,we should pay attention to five problems;1.the issue of local records sequencing;2.the authorship of local records titles;3.the authorship of local records responsive persons;4.the authorship of local records editions;5.the authorship of local records abstracts.In addition,this article analyzes some of the textual examination errors in current local records bibliographies.

关 键 词：中国地方志目录 著录体例 辨证 

分 类 号：K29[历史地理—历史学]