浅议小区地下车库的法律定位  

An Overview of Legal Position for Underground Garage Area

作　　者：李磊[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《理论界》2014年第2期89-92,共4页Theory Horizon

摘　　要：《物权法》颁布之后,小区地下车库问题成为一个焦点。原因是物权法第74条规定过于简单和模糊,因此发生了很多争议,这有可能导致法院在这类问题上判决可能会有多种可能。本文重点讨论是如何在《物权法》的现有框架内解决地下车库的法律定位问题,同时厘清与物权法规定相抵触的行政法规。即应当肯认地下车库的所有权客体地位,同时应该将地下车库所有权纳入登记交易框架。本文同时认为,物权法的本身不承载解决社会问题的职能,从保护业主利益角度出发,地下车库的制度设计应当更多的向公共政策空间延展。After Real right Law released, underground garage area issue has become a focus. Since article 74 of the Real right Law is too simple and vague, so there have been many controversies, which may lead the court judgments to “no steady” situation to some extent.This article focuses on how the Real rights Law resolved within the existing framework of the legal positioning of the underground garage, and clarify the provisions of real rights law in conflict with administrative regulations.That should be willing to recognize the ownership of the underground garage object position, which should be included in the underground garage of ownership registration transaction framework.This article also believes that Real rights law itself does not solve social problems bearing functions, from the perspective of protecting the interests of owners, underground garage institutional design of public policy should be extended by more space.

关 键 词：登记制度 所有权客体 公共政策 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]