西方“前近代经济—社会史”的理论范式及其“中国化”:一个历史与逻辑的述评框架  

Theoretical Paradigm of“Pre- modern's Economic- social History”in the West and its Sinicization: a Review of the History and Logic Framework

作　　者：林光祺[1] 洪利华[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽财经大学财政与公共管理学院,安徽蚌埠233030

出　　处：《兰州商学院学报》2014年第1期1-12,18,共13页Journal of Lanzhou Commercial College

基　　金：安徽省教育厅项目"自然经济"抑或"指令-习俗经济":对中国传统"经济-社会史"理论范式的重新认识(2010sk227);国家社会科学基金项目"中外慈善组织发展史比较研究"(10CSH047)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：关于"前近代经济—社会史"的研究,西方学界首开其端,形成若干种流派。进入中国以后,与本土问题相结合,表现更加多样。本文根据语义分析学中"同一‘能指’背后的‘所指转换’无限可能,以及在‘能指冲突’中理解‘所指’"的方法,一方面将各流派对前近代经济社会结构的理解作为一个维度,形成"共同体本位"与"个体本位"之事实差异;另一方面,将各流派对自由的态度作为一个维度,形成"对自由的认同"与"对反自由的认同"之价值差异。两维交叉,构成一个历史与逻辑的述评框架,从中或许可以窥见各派之间的共同点与分歧所在。About the study of “pre-modern ’ s economic -social history”, the western academia have opened the first port , and it has formed some kinds of schools .It present more diversity when combined with domestic problems after entering China .This article is based on the semantic analytics of method that the same signlfier could translate into different signified and understand the signified in the signlfier conflict.On the one hand, as a dimension that various schools ’ understanding of modern economic and social structure , forming the fact that differences of “the community standard” and“the individual stand-ard”;on the other hand , it makes the various schools ’ attitude towards freedom as another dimension , forming the value differences between the “identification of freedom”and the“identification of the anti -freedom”.The two dimensional cross and constitute a review of the history and logic framework , which may be able to catch a glimpse of the similarities and differences among various schools .

关 键 词：前近代经济社会史理论范式 所指转换 能指冲突 共同体本位 个体本位 theoretical PARADIGM of “pre-modern ’ s economic -social history” 

分 类 号：F091.3[经济管理—政治经济学]