检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建省人民检察院,福建福州350001 [2]华东政法大学研究生院,上海200042
出 处:《兰州商学院学报》2014年第1期118-126,共9页Journal of Lanzhou Commercial College
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"全球治理框架下中美汇率争端的法律问题研究"(10CFX078);华东政法大学研究生创新能力培养专项资金资助项目(2013-2014)
摘 要:执行所涉领域广、执行难度大是中国执行DSB裁决报告的两个主要难题。作为WTO最重要的成员方,美国以实用主义为先导、国家利益为出发点,执行DSB裁决报告,以USTR为主的协调机制亦是其一大特色;欧盟以有利于联盟一体化的态度执行DSB裁决报告。立足中国国情,结合WTO成员方的执行实践,建议今后在执行DSB裁决报告时,树立国家利益至上的总体思路,建立协调人制度,并设立专家委员会配合执行,国内法院以司法克制的态度处理DSB裁决报告及相关诉讼。When enforcing the DSB reports , there are two questions in front of China:one is that the DSB reports are related with many fields and the other is the difficulty of execution of DSB reports .As the most important member in WTO , US inclines to use pragmatism and considers the national interest as the start-ing point for execution of DSB reports .Harmonizing system which talkes USTR as the main point is con-sidered as a main characteristic .Union integration is the main reason if EU would like to carry out DSB reports .Based on Chinese conditions , combined with the practice of the most WTO members , there is no need to give DSB reports direct effect .The paper recommends China establish the general idea of the su-premacy of national interests and a coordination system with a committee of experts .Meanwhile , the do-mestic courts take judicial restraints when confronting DSB reports and related litigations .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.36