新世纪两岸对台湾文学诠释权的争夺——以“反攻”大陆学者写的《台湾文学史》为例  

The Contention of Interpretation Right of Taiwan Literature between the Two Sides of the Taiwan Strait in the New Century

作　　者：古远清[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学海外华文文学研究所

出　　处：《台湾研究》2014年第1期71-77,共7页Taiwan Studies

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目<新世纪台湾文学史论>(项目编号:12BZW120)阶段性成果

摘　　要：某些台湾作家在新世纪对大陆学者撰写的《台湾文学史》或分类史所做的"反攻",主要是出版《台湾新文学史》或类文学史的著作,对"台湾文学是中国文学一个组成部分"、"反共文学"是一种逝去的文学、"皇民文学"就是汉奸文学的观点作出反弹。他们从政治上和学理上清算大陆学者的台湾文学史观时,还把岛内的统派学者"捆绑"在一起.。代表人物有钟肇政、陈芳明、林瑞明、谢辉煌。In the new century, by publishing The New History of Taiwan Literature or similar works, some Taiwan scholars try to counterattack The History of Taiwan Literature or similar works written by main- land scholars. Those Taiwan scholars argue against the viewpoints that ＂Taiwan literature is a part of Chinese literature＂, ＂anti-communist literature＂ has become history, and ＂imperial subject literature＂ is traitor litera ture. From both political and academic viewpoint, they not only criticize the outlook of Taiwan literary history held by mainland scholars, but also accuse the Taiwan scholars who are in pro-reunification. The representa- tives of those Taiwan scholars who are counterattacking the mainland scholars include Zhong Zhaozheng, Chen Fangming, Lin Ruiming and Xie Huihuang.

关 键 词：台湾文学 反共文学 台湾新文学史 皇民文学 诠释权的争夺 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]