检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪华玲[1] 何胜虎[1] 徐日新[1] 谢勇[1] 郑瑞强 陈齐红[3]
机构地区:[1]中南大学江苏省苏北人民医院扬州大学医学院附属医院心内科,长沙410011 [2]重症医学科 [3]东南大学附属中大医院重症医学科
出 处:《中华急诊医学杂志》2014年第3期267-272,共6页Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
基 金:江苏省“333高层次人才培养工程”基金(2007)
摘 要:目的研究PICCO(脉波指示剂连续心输出量监测)技术预测感染性休克继发ALI(急性肺损伤)患者容量反应性的价值。方法前瞻性观察性研究2010年1月至2012年2月江苏省苏北人民医院重症医学科(ICU)收治的感染性休克继发ALI患者42例,入ICU1h、6h,24h分别进行容量负荷试验。根据容量负荷试验前后SVI增加值是否大于15%分为有反应组和无反应组,比较容量负荷试验有反应者和无反应者间CVP(中心静脉压),SVV(每搏量变异),PPV(脉压变异),GEDVI(全心舒张末期容量指数)及ITBI(胸腔内血容量指数)的差异,通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定CVP,SVV,PPV,GEDVI及ITBI判断容量反应性的阈值。结果(1)入ICU1h以GEDVI〈643.5mL/m^2及PPV〉13.5%评价感染性休克继发ALI患者容量反应性,灵敏度为90.9%,特异度为91.9%%(P〈0.01)。(2)人ICU6h以GEDVI〈559.0mL/m^2评价感染性休克继发ALI患者容量反应性,灵敏度为100%,特异度为62.5%(P〈0.01)。入ICU24hCVP,SVV,PPV,GEDVI及ITBI对容量均无反应性(P〉0.05)。结论GEDVI及PPV可作为评价感染性休克继发ALI患者早期容量反应性指标。Objective To evaluate PICCO (pulse indicator continuous cardiac output) to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with acute lung injury secondary to septic shock. Methods We conducted a prospective study on 42 patients with acute lung injury secondary to septic shock, global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI), pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume variation (SVV) , central vein pressure (CVP) and other haemodynamic data were recorded before and after fluid administration of 500 mL of 6% hydroxyethyl starch. Responders were defined as patients with an increase in stroke volume index of at least 15% after fluid loading. Performance of variables was analyzed using receiver operator characteristics analysis. Results GEDVI and PPV, but not SVV and CVP, were able to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with acute lung injury secondary to septic shock 1 hrs after admission to intensive care unit (ICU). The best area under the ROC curve (AUC) was found for GEDVI ( AUC 0. 802, P 〈 0.01 ) and PPV ( AUC 0. 752, P 〈0. 01 ) ; the optimal cut-off of GEDVI and PPV were 643.5 mL/m2 and 13.5%, respectively. At this cut point, the sensitivity was 90. 9%, the specificity was 91.9%, however, only GEDVI was able to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with acute lung injury secondary to septic shock 6hrs after admission to ICU. The best area under the ROC curve (AUC) was found for GEDVI ( AUC 0. 788, P 〈 0. 01 ) . the GEDVI 〈 559 mL/m2 during loading were found to predict volume responsiveness with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 62. 5%. Conclusions GEDVI and PPV predict flui.d responsiveness in patients with acute lung injury secondary to septic shock in the early hours.
关 键 词:感染性休克 急性肺损伤 容量反应性 全心舒张末期容量指数 脉压变异
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222