检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王伟[1] 余凯[1] 张青春[1] 艾合买提江.玉素甫[1]
机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学第一附属医院显微修复重建外科,新疆乌鲁木齐市830054
出 处:《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》2014年第3期240-242,共3页Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(30960390)
摘 要:目的探讨肱骨干骨折采用切开复位钢板内固定治疗的效果。方法回顾性分析自2010-01—2012-01收治的肱骨干骨折165例,其中105例获得随访纳入本研究,根据手术入路的不同将其分为3组:A组上臂内侧切口39例;B组后侧切口34例;C组前外侧切口32例。结果随访时间均超过12个月,3组骨折均愈合良好,A组愈合时间短于B、C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),A、B组皮肤感觉优良率与C组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),A、B、C 3组间肩、肘功能比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论上臂内侧切口入路钢板内固定治疗肱骨干骨折是可行且安全的。Objective To investigate a new method for the open reduction and internal fLxafion of humerus shaft fracture. Methods One hundred and sixty five patients with humerus shaft fractures treated from January 2010 to January 2012 were retrospectively analyzed, of which 105 patients were followed up and according to the different surgical approaches they were divided into three groups; Group A of 39 cases of medial arm incision; Group B posterior incision 34 cases; Group C anterolateral incision in 32 cases. Results The follow-up time was more than 12 months, three groups of patients fractures healed well, Group A healing time was shorter than group B, C, the difference was statistically significant(P 〈0.05), group A, B and group C skin sensation difference was statistically significant(P 〈0.05), group A, B,C among the three shoulder, elbow function, the difference was not statistically significant(P 〉0.05). Conclusion The upper arm medial incision in the humeral shaft fractures is feasible and safe.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63