检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Zhao Huasheng
机构地区:[1]Center for Russia and Central Asia Studies, Fudan University
出 处:《国际问题研究》2014年第2期79-95,144-145,共17页International Studies
摘 要:American academia has three viewpoints regarding American policy in American in Central Asia in the post-Afghanistan era, or three choices facing America: a comprehensive entry, limited intervention or phasing out. Of these a these three options, the limited intervention is the most possible one from the perspective of strategic priorities, resources allocations as well as realistic possibility. This involves the breadth and depth of the intervention.During the past 13 years,the war in Afghanistan has dominated the U.S.Central Asia policy.After the U.S.withdrawal from Afghanistan,the structure of the U.S.interests in Central Asia will change because the war in Afghanistan will no longer be the dominant factor in U.S.policy in Central Asia.Central Asia's role in U.S.foreign policy will decrease,and the U.S.'s concern for Central Asia will subsequently be reduced.The position of the U.S.in Central Asia will decline,but its freedom of policy choice will be increased.Russia and China's influence will rise,and the geopolitical importance of Central Asia will return to the main focus of American policy.The competition between the world powere will change to a new form.The U.S.will continue to promote the new 'silk road'strategy to continue to participate in the 'great game'in Central Asia,but there are different opinions regarding whether Russia or China will be the main opponent to the U.S.in the region.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.106.206