听觉告警信号对司机响应时间的影响研究  

Study on influence of auditory alarm signal on driver's response time

作　　者：郭孜政[1,2] 潘毅润 谭永刚[1] 巴宇航 杨京帅[3] 杨运贵 

机构地区：[1]西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院,四川成都610031 [2]中国科学院心理研究所,北京100101 [3]长安大学汽车学院,陕西西安710064 [4]中国民用航空航行学院空中交通管理学院,四川广汉618307

出　　处：《中国安全科学学报》2014年第1期78-83,共6页China Safety Science Journal

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助(51108390;51108040;31070915);中国博士后科学基金资助(2012M510051)

摘　　要：为研究告警信号对司机提示效应的影响,以正确复杂反应时为指标,采用试验心理学方法,考察纯音告警信号的频率与间隔时长2因素对司机的影响。并采用ANOVA和Tukey-HSD方法,分别对试验数据进行2因素及不同水平间的差异性对比。结果表明,选定的频率范围内纯音告警信号频率对司机的提示效应无影响,纯音告警信号间隔时长对司机提示效应有影响,且这种影响有极限性。当间隔时长在[676,1 024]范围内时,其提示效应明显;间隔时长越短,司机的反应速度越快,提示效应越好;间隔时长超出这一范围时,司机反应时分别接近于其下限389 ms及其上限430 ms。Taking the correct complex reaction time as the index, an experiment with psychology meth- od, was conducted for observing influence of signal frequency and spacing interval on driver＇s response time. Based on experimental data, ANOVA and Tukey-HSD were used to analyze the difference among dif- ferent levels of frequency and spacing interval. The results of analysis show that drivers response time could not be influenced by frequency of alarm signal, but the spacing interval has impact on it, that relationship between alarm signal spacing interval and driver＇s response time could be described by dose- response function curve, and the cuing effect will be more obvious when the spacing interval is with in scope of [ 676,1 024 ] ,that shorter the spacing interval is, the faster driver＇s reaction speed and better cue- ing effect will be, and that when spacing interval is without the scope, the driver＇s response time is close to its lower limit 389 ms or upper limit 430 ms.

关 键 词：听觉告警信号 频率 间隔时长 提示效应 反应时 

分 类 号：X912.9[环境科学与工程—安全科学] U491[交通运输工程—交通运输规划与管理]