历史决定论中不可回避的四个矛盾问题研究述评  

Review of the Researches on Unavoidable Four Contradictions in Historic Decision Theory

作　　者：万丽华[1] 龚培河[2] 

机构地区：[1]南京信息工程大学社科处,南京210044 [2]南京信息工程大学马克思主义学院,南京210044

出　　处：《重庆工商大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第2期1-6,共6页Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：2013年度国家社科基金资助项目(13CKS003)"马克思主义历史进步观与中国特色社会主义历史进步性研究";2010年度教育部人文社会科学研究资助项目(10YJC710053);2009年度教育部人文社会科学研究资助项目(09YJC710031)

摘　　要：历史决定论有四个矛盾问题不可回避:历史规律与人的能动作用关系问题、认识与被认识之间的"俄狄浦斯效应"问题、历史多层次交错运动与历史规律线式制约性问题、"可能性空间"说的横向制约机制与历史规律历时态运动问题。这四个矛盾问题揭示出历史决定论研究存在深层上的瓶颈。历史规律要探索新的进路,必须满足三个条件:一是历史运动以偶然性为表现形式;二是主观揭示出来的历史规律对社会实践活动的影响是客观自在历史规律所支配的历史进程的一部分;三是人的能动性实践活动是不断生成新历史的唯一理由。There are unavoidable four contradictions in historic decision theory such as the contradiction between historic law and human kinetic role, ＂Oedipus Effect＂ contradiction between recognition and being recognized, the contradiction between historic muhiplayer overlapping movement and historic law linear restriction, and the contradiction between horizontal restriction mecha- nism of ＂possible space＂ and historic law tense movement, these four contradictions reveal that there is the bottleneck at deep level about historic decision theory research. Historic law needs to explore new path, and three conditions must be satisfied such as taking occasionality as the expressing form of historic movement, the influence of historic laws revealed subjectively on social practice being a part of historic process supported by objective and natural historic laws, and human kinetic practical activity be- ing only the reason for continuously generating new history.

关 键 词：历史决定论 矛盾 必然性 能动性 历史规律 

分 类 号：B022.2[哲学宗教—哲学理论]