钢筋混凝土偏压构件承载力各国规范算法比较  

Comparison on calculation methods for load bearing capacity of reinforced concrete members in codes of various countries

作　　者：林上顺 陈宝春[1] 

机构地区：[1]福州大学土木工程学院,福建福州350108 [2]福建省交通规划设计院,福建福州350002

出　　处：《广西大学学报（自然科学版）》2014年第1期88-94,共7页Journal of Guangxi University（Natural Science Edition）

基　　金：交通部西部交通建设科技项目(2008-318-00013)

摘　　要：为进一步研究钢筋混凝土偏压构件的承载力计算方法,利用收集的试验资料,采用中国《混凝土结构设计规范(GB 50010-2010)》、《混凝土结构设计规范(GB 50010-2002)》、《公路钢筋混凝土及预应力混凝土桥涵设计规范(JTG D62-2004)》进行计算,发现部分试件采用中国规范计算结果与试验值的偏差超过20%。进一步通过算例,分别采用中国规范和美国《Building Code Requirements For Structural Concrete(ACI 318-05)》、欧洲《Eurocode 2:Design of Concrete Structures(EN 1992-1-1:2004)》规范进行计算,发现在构件计算长度相同的情况下,各规范的计算结果存在较大差异。另外,各规范在构件的计算长度取值方面,也存在一些区别。建议进一步开展钢筋混凝土偏压构件的承载力计算方法的研究。For further research on the load bearing capacity calculation of eccentrically compressed reinforced concrete members, Code for Design of Concrete Structure （GB50010_2010）, Code for Design of Concrete Structure （GB50010-2002） and Code for Design of Highway Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Bridges and Culverts （JTG D62-2004） are adopted to calculate the collect- ed experimental data in documents. It was found that the maximum deviation between the test results and the calculated values is greater than twenty percent. Chinese code and Eurocode 2：Design of Concrete Structures （EN 1992-1-l：2004 ） as well as Building Code Requirements For Structural Concrete （ACI 318-05） are adopted for further calculation. It was shown that the calculated results are very different from one another. Moreover, the codes from different countries are diverse in the i- dentification of effective length for the members. It is suggested that in-depth studies should be carried out for the load bearing capacity of the eccentrically loaded reinforced concrete members.

关 键 词：钢筋混凝土偏压构件 极限承载力 规范比较 二阶效应 计算长度 

分 类 号：TU318[建筑科学—结构工程]